Focolare Movement

“Dialogue or Barbarism”

Jun 15, 2011

A little story that certainly has affected the choices I make. This is how union leader Silvano Lancerotto introduces an episode that helps show the value of choosing dialogue.

Here is what Silvano Lancerotto said during his closing remarks at a gathering in April 2011,promoted by the Focolare’s centre for dialogue with persons of non-religious convictions. «My grandfather was with one of his small sons at a strike by agriculture workers in the countryside of Bassa Veneto, northern Italy, in the early twenties. While standing under a big oak tree that still exists, he was killed by a bullet shot by a fierce landowner. My grandmother Maria, whom they called “curly”, now found herself alone to care for seven children in extreme poverty. She went through a long period of suffering and sacrifice, but managed to never convey to her children any sentiments of revenge. At the end of the First World War, one of her sons, my uncle Libero was moved by the spirit of revenge which had built up in him during all those years of suffering. He searched for his father’s murderer and one day found him. But he took pity on the man when he saw how is family was poor and in disarray. He spared his life and went away. As I now try to imagine that decision made under such unique circumstances, and such a long time ago, I find myself transferring it from the personal choice of an individual person to the choices made by states and politics concerning certain conflict situations today: the Middle East, the Far East, Africa, etc. It would certainly be a big step forward if my uncle’s choice, a choice that grew and matured in his human conscience, were to be practiced by the collective conscience of society today.» Lancerotto goes on to say that this “small story” points in the same direction as Chiara Lubich’s message. “It’s a message,” he says, “ that acts on consciences, looks to the transformation of society, beginning with the transformation of individuals. I share the path she showed to us when she said that dialogue requires each one of us – individuals, movements and states – to give up something in order to see, to read and, above all, to listen to the complexity and the plurality of values found in the modern world, in order enter into relationship with them, to discover their merit, to work for common projects while respecting the legitimate diversity that motivates each one.”        

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Subscribe to Newsletter

Thought of the day

Related post

Artificial Intelligence at the service of humanity

Artificial Intelligence at the service of humanity

The first encyclical of Pope Leo XIV entitled “Magnifica Humanitas” has been published.On the 135th anniversary of “Rerum novarum”, the Pontiff reflected on the Social Doctrine of the Church in the time of artificial intelligence. He appealed for the safeguarding of “a magnificent humanity inhabited by God”, promoting truth, the dignity of work, social justice and peace. In the digital age, there is a need to disarm Artificial Intelligence (AI) and move beyond the “just war” theory, relaunching dialogue and multilateralism.

“Paradise ’49” opens up to the world

“Paradise ’49” opens up to the world

We are publishing Joachim Schwind’s article about the launch of the book, “Paradiso ‘49” (Paradise ’49), by Chiara Lubich, that appeared in Città Nuova: it is a text which has been kept reserved and which can now be used for dialogue with the Church and contemporary culture.